Modernist Cuisine and Nonna’s Cucina

At the AAAS meeting last week, Nathan Myhrvold gave one of the plenary talks.  He is a physicist but is also the author of the magnum opus (really magnum, 6 volumes and 2400 pages) Modernist Cuisine, and more recently the somewhat more user-friendly Modernist Cuisine at Home, which introduces the home cook to the world of foams and sous vide cooking and the Pacojet, a super-powerful (and powerfully expensive) blender.

Myhrvold’s talk, accompanied by lots of video, was great fun, smart and witty.  But I remain of two minds about modernist cuisine.  It is certainly fun and original and imaginative.  Yet reducing cooking to physics and chemistry to me robs it of its spontaneity.  It takes away, to a large extent, that element of chance that could lead to failure but could also lead to serendipitous moments of pure rapture.  And the centrifuges and liquid nitrogen and airs and foams strike me at times as simply gimmicky.

To be sure, modernist cooking has deconstructed and turned upside down and inside out our ideas about food, and that had led to some amazing experiences; I think of Grant Achatz’s Alinea and Aviary in Chicago, or my friend Jonathan Kaplan’s spectacular dinner parties here in Corvallis.  Their aim of engaging all of the senses is a worthy one, and the range of new tastes is astonishing.  That a gastropub in Portland recently offered a sandwich with Douglas fir mayonnaise shows, I think, how broadly these new flavors have reached.

But I persist in think that something is missing, and that at the end of twenty tiny courses one might be physically full and sensually sated but spiritually hungry.  Myhrvold discussed the physics behind decanting red wine, and to gasps from the audience demonstrated that the blender is a far better tool to aerate wine than a decanter.  But I would miss the ritual of slowly pouring the wine into the decanter and watching it sheet down the sides, of gently swirling it and smelling it.  I suppose I could pour it from the bender into the decanter.  I am happy to eat food from a centrifuge.  But I would rather eat my grandmother’s cannoli than anything else in the world.

One thought on “Modernist Cuisine and Nonna’s Cucina

  1. Hi Anita — thanks for the shoutout! As it happens, Shari and I were in LA last weekend visiting my father. Shari had left for a conference in New Orleans, and I was cooking at my father’s place w/o any of my gear, so I had to cook in fully trad mode (also using someone else’s pots and pans, and a stove I’ve only used once or twice before). So I went for traditional ‘low and slow’ approaches… Duck confit one night, and 24 hour short-ribs served in various guises over the next two. In the end, my father was, I think, much more impressed, and much happier, with those meals than he’s ever been with any of my “modernist” creations. 🙂

    That said, I’m more than happy to “hyper-decant” wine in a blender if it needs it, and if anyone has a line on an affordable used centrifuge capable of pulling of a few tens of thousands of gs on about a liter of fluid, I do wish they’d let me know!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s